Tokenwise Savings reads your team's own usage and hands you a short list of dollar-quantified cuts — model downgrades that won't hurt quality, prompts you're paying to re-send uncached, retry storms burning tokens on nothing. No guesswork, no rewrite of how your team works.
Real patterns we already see in team usage data — each one is a line item you can recover.
Thousands of calls run on the most expensive model and score no better than a cheaper one. Savings flags the exact call patterns that are safe to downgrade — and shows the side-by-side so you can trust it.
Typical recovery: 15–40% of model spendA large share of requests repeat a long, identical prompt prefix that is never cached. One config change turns that prefix into a cache hit at a fraction of the price.
Typical recovery: 20–60% on repeated promptsTimeouts and 5xx retries quietly double the cost of the same work. Savings surfaces the loops and the offending jobs so you can add a backoff or an idempotency key.
Typical recovery: dead spend, fully removableIt builds on the usage data Tokenwise already collects — nothing new to install.
Savings runs on the per-developer, per-project token data Tokenwise already ingests. If you track with Tokenwise, there's nothing else to wire up.
Each recommendation comes with the calls behind it and the projected monthly saving. You see why before you act — recommendations are never applied automatically.
A short Slack summary: "You spent $X this week, here's $W of recoverable waste, here's the one change to make." Act on it, or don't — it's reversible either way.
We're building Savings for the teams already watching their Claude Code spend. Tell us your rough monthly bill so we can size the first cuts for real teams — and we'll email you when it's ready.
You're on the list. We'll email you the moment Savings is ready — and we may reach out to size your first cuts.
No spam. Early-access list only. Unsubscribe anytime.